bulls hornets bet
postado por www.rocasdovouga.com.br43 estudantes de uma faculdade rural que desapareceu bulls hornets bet 2014. Outro estudante daquela universidade foi morto num confronto com a 💸 polícia, no mês passado
Confronto de março com estudantes. Os policiais envolvidos estão sob investigação na morte,
Imagens dos protestos mostraram pelo 💸 menos uma dúzia de veículos envolvidos bulls hornets bet fogo e chamas disparando pelas janelas do edifício estadual, que fica perto da 💸 principal rodovia levando a Cidade Do México para Acapulco. O prédio foi saqueado por um grupo chamado "O governo".
Os estudantes 💸 da faculdade de professores radicais Ayotzinapa, localizada nos arredores do Chilpancingo são conhecidos por seus protestos violentos que muitas vezes 💸 envolvem o sequestro dos ônibus e caminhões.
Em março, manifestantes aliados à faculdade comandaram uma caminhonete e a usaram para derrubar 💸 as portas de madeira do Palácio Nacional da Cidade Do México.
Eles bateram as portas e entraram no palácio da era 💸 colonial, onde o presidente vive diariamente antes de serem expulsos por agentes. O Palácio é uma estrutura histórica que remonta 💸 aos anos 1700 foi construído sobre a área do castelo dos imperadores Asteca'
O desaparecimento bulls hornets bet massa continua sendo um 💸 dos casos mais infames de direitos humanos do México.
https://latin-america
Yes cool, a favorite project of mine too for a year now from time to time . It offers
nice 💸 insight.
Also notice you need to consider antes as this makes it even more
interesting and realistic.
You also need to use 💸 ICM to see if this is right though for
some of the totally trashy hands in the bottom 10-20%. Clearly 💸 when you shove with
stupid hands like 23 or 74 or even T2 you have near 26% equity when called 💸 . And you
will be called 13% of the time from 10% ranges for example due to the removal effect
💸 from others having folded to the blinds (more aces left on the deck and good Kings to a
serious degree 💸 actually) . Anyway you will indeed have a net plus EV result in chips
but if your stack is 20bb 💸 when you do such things and you are a very good player you
actually are risking 14bb to win something 💸 like 0.6-0.7bb on that move on avg. Now that
is significant but so is using your 14bb on a QQ 💸 or KK or AA or AK a few hands later
when there is potential dead money at the pot for 💸 much higher benefit per risk taken
and also all the other lucrative situations a good player can spot better (and 💸 which
are no longer lucrativeif the table thinks you are a stealing bully) . Here say 10% of
the time 💸 you lose 14bb (13% times 74%) . Notice that due to the nonlinearity of the
tournament equity function it matters 💸 when you take big risks that can crash your
equity in order to only slightly improve it the rest 90% 💸 of the time.
Maybe a big raise
say 4-5bb is as effective vs a 14bb stack since he needs to go 💸 all in really , he cant
just call you and if he does go all in and you can imagine 💸 he is still on some 10-20%
range these trashy hands are still around 28-30% equity. If he indeed goes all 💸 in with
10-15% of hands then (why would that be any radical difference further from the range
he calls full 💸 all ins?) you might be able to fold and save 10bb since
10/(14+14+0.75)=35% and you really dont have that with 💸 trashy hands against even a full
20% range. In fact probably a great deal as much as 35% of the 💸 bottom hands are folded
easily in this case. That probably will elevate the EV of the "stealing" move. Plus he
💸 may even on occasion just call and you can hit some of these flops with a 5-6% miracle
or even 💸 just a top pair . Its hard to imagine why one would flat call with over 30% of
their stack 💸 (unless on AA,KK etc trapping which is also debatable if its good idea) but
some strange people do it.
Plus clearly 💸 you will be doing all kinds of better things
with your top hands anyway. If one can indeed refine the 💸 action with the junky hands
and have it ICM approved then its probably right to be that audacious.
But i still
💸 reserve some hesitation on such moves that are very bold in tourneys that you hold some
reasonable edge in skill 💸 over the majority of the players left which in itself gives
you a much higher tournament equity function and much 💸 more serious bias against moves
that can potentially devastate you. My point is one shouldnt be making it that easy 💸 for
others possibly of inferior skill to inflict a massive blow to his/her stack. Imagine
if the guy is some 💸 pissed off crazy idiot that thinks you are bullying him -and you do
in fact- (and he likes coin flips 💸 in his mind) and he calls you with 30% of his hands.
Those low end trashy hands will still be 💸 only near 30 to 32% vs this wider range. It
will be coming 35-40% too due to the levated AX,KX 💸 premium hands (removal effect
mentioned earlier). So it will then be more
like
(0.32*(14*2+0.75)=4.8)
0.65*1.75-0.35*4.8=-0.54bb almost the same as folding the
sb.
That 💸 big size raising option may be in fact a better alternative. In the minds of
some intelligent players it may 💸 even sound more threatening than the all in is for
clearly the guy is thinking why would you be doing 💸 all in with AA,KK,QQ etc and risk no
action.
melhor casa de aposta online
Yes cool, a favorite project of mine too for a year now from time to time . It offers
nice 💸 insight.
Also notice you need to consider antes as this makes it even more
interesting and realistic.
You also need to use 💸 ICM to see if this is right though for
some of the totally trashy hands in the bottom 10-20%. Clearly 💸 when you shove with
stupid hands like 23 or 74 or even T2 you have near 26% equity when called 💸 . And you
will be called 13% of the time from 10% ranges for example due to the removal effect
💸 from others having folded to the blinds (more aces left on the deck and good Kings to a
serious degree 💸 actually) . Anyway you will indeed have a net plus EV result in chips
but if your stack is 20bb 💸 when you do such things and you are a very good player you
actually are risking 14bb to win something 💸 like 0.6-0.7bb on that move on avg. Now that
is significant but so is using your 14bb on a QQ 💸 or KK or AA or AK a few hands later
when there is potential dead money at the pot for 💸 much higher benefit per risk taken
and also all the other lucrative situations a good player can spot better (and 💸 which
are no longer lucrativeif the table thinks you are a stealing bully) . Here say 10% of
the time 💸 you lose 14bb (13% times 74%) . Notice that due to the nonlinearity of the
tournament equity function it matters 💸 when you take big risks that can crash your
equity in order to only slightly improve it the rest 90% 💸 of the time.
Maybe a big raise
say 4-5bb is as effective vs a 14bb stack since he needs to go 💸 all in really , he cant
just call you and if he does go all in and you can imagine 💸 he is still on some 10-20%
range these trashy hands are still around 28-30% equity. If he indeed goes all 💸 in with
10-15% of hands then (why would that be any radical difference further from the range
he calls full 💸 all ins?) you might be able to fold and save 10bb since
10/(14+14+0.75)=35% and you really dont have that with 💸 trashy hands against even a full
20% range. In fact probably a great deal as much as 35% of the 💸 bottom hands are folded
easily in this case. That probably will elevate the EV of the "stealing" move. Plus he
💸 may even on occasion just call and you can hit some of these flops with a 5-6% miracle
or even 💸 just a top pair . Its hard to imagine why one would flat call with over 30% of
their stack 💸 (unless on AA,KK etc trapping which is also debatable if its good idea) but
some strange people do it.
Plus clearly 💸 you will be doing all kinds of better things
with your top hands anyway. If one can indeed refine the 💸 action with the junky hands
and have it ICM approved then its probably right to be that audacious.
But i still
💸 reserve some hesitation on such moves that are very bold in tourneys that you hold some
reasonable edge in skill 💸 over the majority of the players left which in itself gives
you a much higher tournament equity function and much 💸 more serious bias against moves
that can potentially devastate you. My point is one shouldnt be making it that easy 💸 for
others possibly of inferior skill to inflict a massive blow to his/her stack. Imagine
if the guy is some 💸 pissed off crazy idiot that thinks you are bullying him -and you do
in fact- (and he likes coin flips 💸 in his mind) and he calls you with 30% of his hands.
Those low end trashy hands will still be 💸 only near 30 to 32% vs this wider range. It
will be coming 35-40% too due to the levated AX,KX 💸 premium hands (removal effect
mentioned earlier). So it will then be more
like
(0.32*(14*2+0.75)=4.8)
0.65*1.75-0.35*4.8=-0.54bb almost the same as folding the
sb.
That 💸 big size raising option may be in fact a better alternative. In the minds of
some intelligent players it may 💸 even sound more threatening than the all in is for
clearly the guy is thinking why would you be doing 💸 all in with AA,KK,QQ etc and risk no
action.
próxima:pixbet futebol aposta owl pix bet cassno
anterior:cbet apostas
Artigos relacionados
- esporte da sorte plinko
- jogos de caca niqueis e bingos gratis uol
- esporte da sorte aplicativo para baixar
- roleta de ganhar dinheiro
- depósito mínimo realsbet
- pixbet é bom
Coordenação •2015•